Talk:Shattered Stars and Stripes: Another One

Temporary Algorithm
So i ran into some issues when testing the algo I created for this game, so we will be using this one for now.

Nations Per Side
Leaders (L): Directly involved in the conflict, no more than 1 per side per front. 100% of War Tier Score Allies (A): Send men to support, and contribute to leadership, but not the main leader of the war. 30% of War Tier Score + Troops sent. 3 per war (Includes M as well) (Must be an ally before the start of the war to join as an A) Military Supporter: Contribute manpower, but not involved with leadership. 20% of War Tier Score+ Troops Sent. Max 3 per war (Includes A as well) Supplier (S): Contributes weapons, medical supplies, food aid, etc. No boots on the ground. +10% of War Tier Score. Max 5 per conflict Political/Ideological Support: Denounces invasion or conflict, but does not send anything to help. +2 for each. Max 5 per conflict.  Military Tier factors in Quality and Quantity of Forces, economic tiers are based off of 2015 GDP. Military Tier factors in Quality and Quantity of Forces, economic tiers are based off of 2015 GDP.

Military Tiers
Runnoff tiers may be made later

Tier 1 (+25)


 * Russia
 * Texas
 * New York
 * Pennsylvania
 * Alabama

Tier 2 (+20)
Carolina</li>Illinois</li>Colorado</li>Washington</li>Arizona</li>North California</li>Indiana</li></ul> 7  Nations Max

<h4 data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">Tier 3 (+15) South California</li>Virginia</li>Louisiana</li>Michigan</li>Massachusetts</li>Maryland</li>Mexico</li>North Florida</li><li>New Jersey</li><li>Oregon</li><li>Missouri</li></ul> Tier 4 (+10) <ul><li>Utah</li><li>New Mexico</li><li>Alaska</li><li>Hawaii</li><li>Kentucky</li><li>Wisconsin</li><li>Minnesota </li><li>Connecticut</li><li>Oklahoma</li><li>Mississippi</li></ul> Tier 5 (+5) <ul><li>Everyone else</li></ul> </li></li>

Economic Tiers
Tier 1 (+15) <ul><li>Russia</li><li>Texas</li><li>New York</li><li>Illinois</li><li>Pennsylvania</li><li>North Carolina</li></ul> 5 Nations Max

<h4 data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">Tier 2 (+12) <ul><li>New Jersey</li><li>Virginia</li><li>Massachusetts</li><li>Washington</li><li>Minnesota</li><li>Maryland</li><li>Alabama</li><li>Indiana</li></ul> 7 Nations max

<h4 data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">Tier 3 (+9) <ul><li>Michigan</li><li>Tennessee</li><li>Colorado</li><li>Wisconsin</li><li>Arizona</li><li>Missouri</li><li>Connecticut</li><li>Louisiana</li><li>Oregon</li></ul> Tier 4 (+6) <ul><li>Kentucky</li><li>California</li><li>Oklahoma</li><li>North California</li><li>Mexico</li><li>North Florida</li><li>Iowa</li><li>Kansas</li><li>Utah</li><li>Nevada</li><li>Arkansas</li><li>Nebraska</li></ul> Tier 5 (+3) <ul><li>Everyone else</li></ul>

Population
<p data-rte-fromparser="true" data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">This is taken from Leaders only. <ul><li>+1 for every million of people for the first 15 million. </li><li>between 15 million and 30 million, add 2 and than .75 for each million. </li><li>between 30 million and 45 million, add 5 and than .5 for each million </li><li>between 45 million and 60 million, add 8 to the current score, and than .25 for each million </li><li>between 60 million and 75 million, add 12 to the current score. </li><li>for 75 million and up, add 15 to the score </li></ul> <p data-rte-fromparser="true">So, Massachusetts would get +6, while California would get 37.25 for population.

Location
<p data-rte-fromparser="true" data-rte-filler="true"> <h4 data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">Defending <ul><li>At Capital:+15 </li><li>At Major City:+10 </li><li>At Minor City/Suburbia:+5 </li><li>Meeting in an open field/defenseless </li><li>Open Waters:0 </li><li>Near Coastline:+5 </li><li>Near Coastal City:+10 </li></ul> Attacking <ul><li>At Defender's Capital:0 </li><li>At Major City:+5 </li><li>At Minor City/Subria:+10 </li><li>Meeting in an Open Field/defender is defenseless:+15 </li><li>Open Waters:+10 </li><li>Near Coastline:+5 </li><li>Open Waters:0 </li></ul> Counter-Attacking <ul><li>Liberating Capital:+10 </li><li>Liberating Major City:+7 </li><li>Liberating Minor City/Subria:+5 </li></ul> Modifiers <p data-rte-fromparser="true" data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">For attacker when in enemy territory <ul><li>Storming a Coastline:-6 </li><li>Fighting in Appalachian Mountains:-10 </li><li>Fighting in Rocky Mountains: -30 </li><li>Fighting in a desert:-8 </li></ul>

Numbers

 * Maximum Army Size:
 * Land Concentrated: 2% of Population
 * Naval Concentrated: 1% of Population
 * Maximum Navy Size
 * Land Concentrated: .045% of Population
 * Naval Concentrated: .9% of population

In the event of an NPC war, divide 1/2 of their max manpower equally across all battles and fronts unless mod specified.
 * +1 for every 15,000 men
 * +1 for every 15 ships

<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="article-table" data-rte-style="width: 500px;" style="width: 500px;" data-rte-attribs=" border=0 cellpadding=1 cellspacing=1 class=article-table style=width: 500px;">

<tr data-rte-empty-lines-before="1"> <th scope="col" data-rte-attribs=" scope=col">Victory Type <th scope="col" data-rte-attribs=" scope=col">Margin of Victory <th scope="col" data-rte-attribs=" scope=col">Winner's Casualties <th scope="col" data-rte-attribs=" scope=col">Loser's Casualties Phyric 5 points or less 75% 90% Indecisive 6-10 points 50% 75% Tactical 11-15 points 30% 75% Decisive 16-25 points 20% 70% Total more than 25 points 15% 65%

You take the above rates and multiply it by the proportion of your troops to enemy troops, with the most being 100%. So if the enemy has 50% of your forces and you win a decisive victory, you take 50% of 20% for your casualties. (In effect in the 2022 turn) <p data-rte-fromparser="true" data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">If your stability is over 60% you gain back 25% of your man power per year. <p data-rte-fromparser="true" data-rte-empty-lines-before="1">You can not raises forces from a territory in your region that you have not held for 3 turns, and for nations outside of your region the number is 5 turns.

Recent Wars
<ul><li>-6 for each recent year you where an L or A in a major war</li><li>-4 for each recent year you where an L or A in a minor war</li><li>-2 for each recent year you supported someone militarly</li><li>-1 you where a supplier in a war.</li></ul> Penalties fade after 10 turns with or without conflict or 5 turns with no military conflict

Government Strength
100%-60% stability is a strong state and gains an additional 5 points

60%-40% is a weak state and gains 0 points

40%-20% is a failing state and loses 5 points

20%-10% is a failed state and loses 10 points

10% or lower means there is a state in name only, and you lost 50 points

Implemented in the 2021 turn.

Vassal Penelty
<ul><li>First vassal: subtract 5% of Final score </li><li>Second vassal: 15% of Final Score </li><li>Third Vassal and on: An additional 10% for each additional vassal invovled in the war. This is subtracted from your final score. </li></ul>

Multiple Fronts
<ul><li>-10 for each front </li></ul>

Popular Revolt or Major Enemy
<ul data-rte-empty-lines-before="1"><li>50% increase </li></ul>

"Lion in sheep's clothing"
<ul><li>If you are invading a nation you have requested a peaceful merger with, they gain a 40% bonus in the algorithim and require one additional victory</li><li>The additional victory does not grant you a victory point.</li><li>if you are invading a nation you are currently an ally with, you lose 10% of your final score. If the alliance is broken for at least 1 full turn before the invasion no penalty is applied, however the alliance must be removed from the list below to count as broken. </li><li>If you invade your close ally, you will lose 30% of your final score. If the alliance is broken for at least 1 full turn before the invasion no penalty is applied, however the alliance must be removed from the list below to count as broken. </li><li>If you do not aid your close ally, you will lose 15% of your war score for the next 10 turns, and lose 15 stablity.</li></ul>

Result
The final result you use the Victory points Counter below. To collapse a nation, you must deplete its victory points to 0. Each Attack or Counter Attack Won lets you take a Victory point from the nation you are invading and add it to your. Defensive wins net no victory points. You may have up to 5 battles per year per front.

Furthermore, a nation will also collapse when they have less than 10% of their maximum manpower.

If stablity falls to low, then a nation may capitulate without depeleting its victory points

For multistate nations, you must take the starting number of victory points from the nations core.

Stability Rankings
Stability rankings are how strong your nation's state (as in the governing institutions) is. The following things will reduce stability: Your stability, assuming none of the penalties are applicable, will grow by 5% per year, capping at 100%. Additionally, mod events might increase or decrease stability.
 * Minor War (Less than 50% of forces involved): 2% Per Turn
 * Major War (More than 50% of forces involved): 6% per turn
 * Economic Res session: 4% per turn
 * Economic Depression:10% Per turn
 * Revolt: 20%, and an additional 4% per turn the revolt goes on
 * Civil War: 70%, 4% per turn, regain 35% at the end of the civil war.
 * Annexing another nation with a smaller population: 8% flat loss (halved for conquests)
 * Annexing another nation with a same or similar population: 10% flat loss(halved for conquests)
 * Annexing another nation with a larger population:40% flat loss (halved for conquests)
 * Annexing more than 1 nation per year: 15% loss every year applicable.

Alliances
This will be implemented in the 2021 turn. Every Nation is limited to one close ally and four other allies.

If your close ally is an NPC, they will always aid you in a war. Regular NPC allies have a 1/5 chance of not aiding you in a war.

Close allies must be mutual. Thus, each nation can only be a close ally with one other nation.

Format as following:
 * Allied States
 * Close Ally
 * Other Ally 1
 * Other Ally 2
 * Other Ally 3
 * Other Ally 4
 * Alabama
 * Kentucky
 * Virginia
 * Washington
 * Arizona
 * Utah
 * New Mexico
 * Kentucky
 * Alabama
 * Virginia
 * New American Union
 * Still figuring out my alliances, will probably modify this in the foreseeable future, stay tuned. ~Bear
 * United Republics of Carolina and South Florida
 * North Florida
 * New American Union
 * Michigan
 * Virginia

2018
Attacking: Ohio

Defending: Michigan, with troops from Illonois and New York

Attack 1
Attacker Total: +56
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +12
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: 46 Indecisive victory +1 VP for Ohio
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +7
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5
 * Fronts: -10

2019
A ttacking:  Ohio

Defending: Michigan, with troops from Illonois and New York

Ohio Attack on Michigan
Attacker Total: +57
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: 77.5 Decisive Victory
 * Tiers: +41.5
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +11
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Battle 1
Attacker Total: 77.5
 * Tiers: +41.5
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +11
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: +63 Tactical Victory
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +8
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

51k losses for the Coalition. 90k losses for Ohio

Battle 2
Attacker Total: 75.5
 * Tiers: +41.5
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +9
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: +57 Decisive Victory
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

'''23.8k lossess for the coaliton. 18k Lost for Ohio'''

Battle 3
Attacker Total: 72.5
 * Tiers: +41.5
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +6
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: +55 Decisive Victory
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +0
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

'''18.5k lost for Coaliton. 7.2k lost for Ohio'''

Battle 4
Attacker Total: 71.5
 * Tiers: +41.5
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +5
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender Total: +55 Decisive Victory
 * Tiers: +32
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: N/A
 * Numbers: +0
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

'''14.8k lost for the Coalition. 3k lost for Ohio'''

Remaining forces:

59.2k for the coalition, 1k for Ohio

Result: Ohio loses 4 VP

2020
Result: '''Without the Manpower to defend itself, Ohio collapses with minimal resistance after this turn. If an outside power wishes to assist them then they can defend themselves.'''

2020
Attacker: Washington

Defender: Oregon

Battle of Astoria
Attacker Total: +57
 * Tiers: +29
 * Population: +7
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +6
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender' Total: +43
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +5
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Tactical Victory Oregon loses 60k, Washington loses 28.5k

Battle of Pendelton
Attacker Total: +55
 * Tiers: +29
 * Population: +7
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +4
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender' Total: +38 Decisive Victory Oregon loses 12k, Washington loses 13.3k
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Battle of The Dalles
Attacker Total: +54
 * Tiers: +29
 * Population: +7
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender' Total: +38 Decisive Victory Oregon loses 4.8K, Washington loses 10.3k
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Battle of St. Helens
Attacker Total: +54
 * Tiers: +29
 * Population: +7
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender' Total: +38 Decisive Victory Oregon loses 2k, Washington loses 8.58k
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Battle of Hood River
Attacker Total: +54
 * Tiers: +29
 * Population: +7
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

Defender' Total: +38 Decisive Victory Oregon's army is essentially gone, they collapse, Washington loses 67.5k total, 27.5k left
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

US Gold Reserves and Interstate Propaganda Argument
Copied and deleted from the main page:

Taking over the media of foreign states is implausible- it would cost a huge amount, but even assuming money is no object, is illegal due to media censorship and sovereignty legislature. There are laws in place in each state that prevent the scenario from ever happening, and would instead probably turn the state against you. - Emp

You're actually kidding correct? Just take a look at RT or Sputnik or even Iran's Press TV. I would suggest making a more thorough research into Media buyouts by foreign outlets. Now i expect you next time to come back with real arguements... Also i don't really care if it would turn the state against me as you failed to notice. Also about the economical side of this arguement, Fort Knox has a little more than half the Gold reserves of the former US government "Fort Knox holdings are 4,582 metric tons (147.3 million oz. troy).  At the rate of $1,226.60 an ounce it is worth about $180 billion. The depository also holds monetary gold coins." - "The US holds more gold than any other country, with about 8,133 metric tons in total (not just at Fort Knox), or about 2.4 times that of the next leading country, Germany (which in 2014 owned 3,387.1 metric tons)." ~Bear

Sorry at no point was my argument based on money to clarify- I'm not saying you couldn't do it I'm saying it would you a lot- money that you couldn't spend on your own military or inside your own state. I would suggest that you read my arguement before you respond so heatedly- last time I checked none of those channels are relevant in the slightest. Many nations use networks that broadcast their own views, usually rather overtly, and indeed Sputnik, your example, is directly owned by the Russian Govt, through Russia Today. RT and Press TV are both good examples of shill media outlets too. These networks are all international, and are easily accessible in the West. However, lets be clear, that's not what you proposed. You instead talk of buying Tennessee and West Virginia's media outlets, rather than extending coverage of your own to the states. This IS not possible- I suggest it is you that research for the laws on media sovereignty are not hard to find. Why do you think that foreign operators of hostile nations over the past decades have never done what you suggest? It is no revolutionary idea I am afraid- it cannot be done because the government has to vet all media outlets to ensure that main channels preserve at least some resemblance of impartiality, despite the aspersions of Fox News, and more importantly ensure that there is a degree of balance in the views expressed; that is to say not all mainstream channels are communist for example. There are stringent checks on owners and media monopolies are unheard of in the democratic west because it is categorically forbidden. Finally, you should be aware that you should care about turning the state against you, as this directly contradicts the point of using propaganda. As a side note, you realise that Fort Knox's gold is not entirely usable?

First off i never talked about a monopoly on information, rather than simply expresing my nation's point of view (propaganda) to other states, second i never stated that i wanted to improve relations with the governments of the states of West Virginia and Tennessee. Rather what i am doing is increasing popular support for the Confederacy. Although i am improving relations with the rest of the Southern States. And i see your point about buying huge media outlets, although i am buying small and cheap ones, preferably facing bankruptcy, that are intergated into my media outlets as subsidiaries. RT and Sputnik have studios in US and UK that transmit their live broadcast of news in there. Newspappers can be printed from my home state too. And obviously the HQs are located inside my state. So in essence i am absording minor media outlets in these states in order to expend my coverage and presence there. Sorry if my post was confusing. Fort Knox gold is for the most part usable. I can easily cash it to the international markets or take advantage of it/capitalize on it. ~Bear

Now as you suggested (and you were right to) sorry that i ignored it (To avoid confusions and misunderstandings) to thoroughly explain what i intended, if its ok with you i am gonna remove this arguement now that i corrected it (Check it and feel free to express your opinion if you disagree with something) to conserve space from the turn as this issue now is non-existant (Unless ofc it isn't). ~Bear

I am glad you have clarified what you meant concerning media outlets. However, I still beg to differ on Fort Knox gold. It is essentially stolen from the US government, which still exists in some states I assume, and even if it doesn't it would belong to its unpaid creditors- the real world is not 'finders keepers'. - Emp

Well we are talking about 50 US states, hit by recession hard, not members of the UN, with little next to nothing international standing. And finally, if anything i never claimed to be in any way related with the former US, unlike you claimed to be the direct successor of the US. I claimed to be the rightfull successor to the Confederacy. So in essense you and Fires, that claim to be successors to the US, are obliged to pay its obligations, for me its finders keepers. Same thing happened to the former US military bases armies and resources, so your arguement is kinda invalid, i am NEVER gonna pay any former US obligations or creditors. Only Kentucky state agreements are to be abided. ~Bear

'Successor'- exactly. A different nation in the same role- NOT the same nation, so no neither of us are liable to creditors. Finders keepers works on the ground sure, with military bases etc- but not on the international market. Creditors wouldn't care about military bases- it's a recession so all they would want is quickly redeemable forms of debt repayment. Whilst the law would prevent them stripping states dry to pay the debts, it would not stop them viewing gold that is not legally your state's property as theirs to repay debts, especially since much of the gold reserves are collateral. There is no way they would accept it as payment when they could, with the law on their side, demand it all as their own unless it was evenly distributed amongst the states to aid with recovery. - Emp

Well they could try to take it under my dead body. I'm never gonna just hand it out. The former US collapsed and they lost their monies. Also i highly doubt that the creditors even care at all about recovery of the former US states, if foreigners, if not there will claim that their state deserves a bigger part of the "loot" or collaterals as you say, its not likely that they will agree on anything. ~Bear

The point of collateral is it's on paper- those who had it through gold would know exactly how much was theirs. Secondly, it would indeed be over your dead body because the biggest foreign creditors to the US are Japan and China, who are more than a match for any state. - Emp

I say let them try, if they can somehow reach me, well they shall face a fuckton of troubles and in the end i will just get disposed of the gold, just to fuck with them. ~Bear

Democratic way to remove elected officials
Copied and deleted from the main page:

Kentucky disapproves of both nation's recent expansion into other Southern States, but ultimately favors the fellow Confederate government of Alabama, instead of North Carolina who claims itself as direct successor of the fallen US government. We also disapprove of the coup against the rightfull democratically elected Southern Carolinan government, assusing North Carolina of hypocricy.

What coup? There was a referendum with the support of the government and people of SC, and some politicians refused to accept the democratic right of the people- Carolina demands an apology.

Confederate Kentucky refuses to apoligize, stating that removing elected officials is seen as aggressive behaviour towards its neighbors.

Towards it's neighbours? That's a bit of a stretch! Also, Id ask you to read my post as they were not removed. Another argument of yours that wasn't thought out.

"Whilst joint elections are organised for June where both states will merge properly, the South Carolinian national guard arrests Nikki Haley and all those in legislature who are fighting the clear mandate of the people. They are allowed to continue in their posts until June, under close house arrest and censorship, and without any public engagements, so as to prevent government instability prior to the restructuring. During this time, they are tried by the South Carolinian House and Senate Ethics commitees, and many are dismissed and barred from immediate re-election although those who are acquitted may run for election again."

First part goes fine, all democratic and reasonable "Whilst joint elections are organised for June where both states will merge properly" until you arrest the opposition "the South Carolinian national guard arrests Nikki Haley and all those in legislature". From there on "They are allowed to continue in their posts until June, under close house arrest and censorship, and without any public engagements" to "During this time, they are tried by the South Carolinian House and Senate Ethics commitees, and many are dismissed and barred from immediate re-election" doesn't really sound good or democratic, but oh well. ~Bear

Whilst I appreciate you making the point, if you are familiar with US politics the Ethics committees are the most democratic method of trial. Normally, following procedure, they would be suspended during that time but in the interests of continuancy I decided not to do so- Emp

My point is a different one, one could claim that since the referendum results were so close 51% to 49%, a recount in some counties could totaly change the landescape and the result completely, as it happens in many referendums and elections. Other than that, de jure the state of South Carolina was independent from your control and while you can spark revolts with your supporters and/or invade it, you cannot hijack its army or so Edge would claim i believe, having seen it happen in similar cases. ~Bear

By the same argument, Donald Trump could be kicked out if some of the democrat senators or reps. said so, despite winning the election. And since it is legally now my nation, even if some in government refuse to accept so, I am within my rights to order its national guard to do my bidding. - Emp

So you are claiming you that the majority of the South Carolina government peacefully handed over power to you, correct? Anyway i am just saying that Edge might not allow this, since nomimally you didn't control the nation, as its government opposed you for some reason, not that i consider the event to be very realistic, but since its done... Other thing is that the actions you took aren't exactly the most democratic ones, for one claiming to be the defender of freedom and liberty and the rightfull successor to the US. ~Bear

Yes, I am. It is very implausible that they would not, however for the sake of clarification I will ask the moderators to confirm this - Emp

Battle of St. Croix
Minnesota Wisconsin Indecisive victory. 13k Casualties for Minnesota, 11k Casualties for Wisconsin
 * Tiers:22
 * Population:+5
 * Location:+10
 * Numbers:+1
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:38
 * Tiers:19
 * Population:+6
 * Location:+5
 * Numbers:+1
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:31

Battle of Polk
Minnesota Wisconsin Indecisive victory. 13k Casualties for Minnesota, 11k Casualties for Wisconsin
 * Tiers:22
 * Population:+5
 * Location:+10
 * Numbers:+2
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:39
 * Tiers:19
 * Population:+6
 * Location:+5
 * Numbers:+1
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:31

Battle of Burrnet
Minnesota Wisconsin Indecisive victory. 13k Casualties for Minnesota, 11k Casualties for Wisconsin
 * Tiers:22
 * Population:+5
 * Location:+10
 * Numbers:+2
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:39
 * Tiers:19
 * Population:+6
 * Location:+5
 * Numbers:+1
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:31

Battle of Douglas
Minnesota Wisconsin Indecisive victory. 13k Casualties for Minnesota, 11k Casualties for Wisconsin
 * Tiers:22
 * Population:+5
 * Location:+10
 * Numbers:+2
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:39
 * Tiers:19
 * Population:+6
 * Location:+5
 * Numbers:+1
 * Recent Wars:0
 * Vassals:0
 * Result:31

Result: Wisconsin collapses.

Deseret
<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +33
 * Population: +3
 * Tiers: +16
 * Location: +15
 * Modifiers: -8 (desert)
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada 

<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +13
 * Tiers: +11
 * Population: +3
 * Location: +0
 * Modifiers: -8 (dessert)
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Decisive Victory Nevada loses 18,000 troops, Deseret loses 6,000 troops

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada: 30,000-18,000= 12,000

<p style="font-size:16px;">Deseret: 30,000-6,000= 24,000

Deseret
<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +27
 * Population: +3
 * Tiers: +16
 * Location: +10 (Minor City)
 * Modifiers: -8 (desert)
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada 

<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +16
 * Tiers: +11
 * Population: +3
 * Location: +5 (Minor city)
 * Modifiers: -8 (dessert)
 * Numbers: 0
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Tatical Victory Nevada loses 9,000 troops, Deseret loses 12,000 troops

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada: 12,000-9,000= 3,000

<p style="font-size:16px;">Deseret: 24,000-7,200= 16,800

Deseret Edit
<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +27
 * Population: +3
 * Tiers: +16
 * Location: +10 (Minor City)
 * Modifiers: -8 (desert)
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada 

<p style="font-size:16px;">Total: +16
 * Tiers: +11
 * Population: +3
 * Location: +5 (Minor city)
 * Modifiers: -8 (dessert)
 * Numbers: 0
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Government: +5

<p style="font-size:16px;">Tatical Victory Nevada loses 2,250 troops, Deseret loses 5,040 troops

<p style="font-size:16px;">Nevada: 3,000-2,250-= 750

<p style="font-size:16px;">Deseret: 16,800-5,040= 11,760

<p style="font-size:16px;">Deseret conquers Nevada, killing Casa Nostra and seizing all the money of the mafia and corporations.

UN Conference for the former American States
Presiding over the conference is United Nations Secretary General António Guterres. The Four Remaining members of the Security Council, China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, as well as the Rotating Members, Brazil, Mexico Ethiopia, Nigeria, Morocco, Iran, Mongolia, Spain, Norway, and Lithuania, all have representatives at the conference. The various actors may sign in below, placing the name of the faction and the name of the representative in question. You may advocate for why you should be recognized either as an independent nation or as the Successor to the United States.
 * The New American Union shall be repersented by its president, Spencer S. Snelling
 * The Great Lakes Republic shall be represented by its Vice President, Brian Calley
 * The Socialist Republic of The Midwest will be represented by President Lincoln Price
 * The Federal Republic of Cascadia will be represented by President Jay Inslee.
 * The Union of Confederated States will be represented by its head of foreign affairs, Andrea Tullos
 * The Confederate States of America will be represented by a delegation headed by President David Duke, including other influencial members of the current administration such as Minister of Propaganda Bureau Steve Bannon and General Stephen Donald "Don" Black.
 * The United Republic of Carolina and Southern Florida shall be represented by its United Nations Ambassador (unrecognised) Sarah Bascom

Battle of East Brandford
Attacker Total: 56.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Tactical Victory. 4.5k causalities for NAU, 18k for Penn

Battle of West Brandford
Attacker Total: 56.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Tactical Victory. 4.5k causalities for NAU, 18k for Penn

Battle of Tioga
Attacker Total: 56.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Tactical Victory. 4.5k causalities for NAU, 18k for Penn

Battle of East Potter
Attacker Total: 56.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Tactical Victory. 4.5k causalities for NAU, 18k for Penn

Battle of West Potter
Attacker Total: 56.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Tactical Victory. 4.5k causalities for NAU, 18k for Penn

Overall Result
Huge gains for NAU, Pennsylvania loses 5 Victory Points

Battle of Erie
Attacker Total: 47
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +19
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -8
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Phyric Victory For Michigan, MI loses 22k, PA loses 27k

Battle of North Crawford
Attacker Total: 47
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +19
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -8
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Phyric Victory For Michigan, MI loses 22k, PA loses 27k

Battle of South Crawford
Attacker Total: 47
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +19
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -8
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Phyric Victory For Michigan, MI loses 22k, PA loses 27k

Battle of North Mercer
Attacker Total: 47
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +19
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -8
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Phyric Victory For Michigan, MI loses 22k, PA loses 27k

Battle of South Mercer
Attacker Total: 47
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +19
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -8
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 43
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +13
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: -10

Phyric Victory For Michigan, MI loses 22k, PA loses 27k

Overall Result
Michigan comes out barely ahead, and with massive causalities, but still saps Pennsylvania of 5 VP, collapsing the nation

Battle of ??? (New English Invasion)
Attacker Total: 45
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 52.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Indecisive victory for NAU, 15k NAU causalities, 25K for New England Coalition

Battle of ??? (New English Invasion)
Attacker Total: 45
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 52.5 Indecisive victory for NAU, 15k NAU causalities, 25K for New England Coalition
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Battle of ??? (New English Invasion)
Attacker Total: 45
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 52.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Indecisive victory for NAU, 15k NAU causalities, 25K for New England Coalition

Battle of ??? (NAU Counter Attack)
Total: 59.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 56
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Phyric victory for NAU, 37k NAU causalities, 22K for New England Coalition

Battle of ??? (NAU Counter Attack pt2)
Total: 59.5
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +21.5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: -6
 * Fronts: -10

Defender Total: 56
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Phyric victory for NAU, 10k NAU causalities, 2.7K for New England Coalition

Overall Result
Yuge NAU victory - Massachusetts loses two VP, Huge gains in western mass, and coalition forces down to 300 (NAU has 3k)

Battle of ??? (NAU Counter Attack pt3)
Total: 75.25
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +34.25
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +3
 * Recent Wars: -12
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 64
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -4
 * Fronts: n/a

Tactical Victory for NAU 15k dead for NAU, 11.5k dead for NEC

Battle of ??? (NAU Counter Attack pt4)
Total: 74.25
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +34.25
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: -12
 * Fronts: n/a

Defender Total: 63
 * Tiers: +33
 * Population: +10
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: -4
 * Fronts: n/a

Tactical Victory for NAU 10k dead for NAU, 5.6k dead for NEC

Overall result
Mass Dies. SAD!

Eastern Front (2020)
Attackers: Virginia (L), Kentucky (A), Alabama (A).

Defenders: Virginian Rebels (L)

Battle of Shenandoah Valley
Attacker Total: 58.9
 * Tiers: 27+4.8+11.1=42.9
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +15
 * Modifiers: -10
 * Numbers: +12
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a
 * Government:-5

Defender Total: 33
 * Tiers: 27
 * Population: 2
 * Location: 0
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: 60k=+4
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Total Victory for the allies. 27k causalities for Virginian coalition, 30k for Conservatives

Battle of Piedmont
Attacker Total: 51.9
 * Tiers: 27+4.8+11.1=42.9
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: -10
 * Numbers: +10
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a
 * Government:-5

Defender Total: 36
 * Tiers: 27
 * Population: 2
 * Location: 5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Tactical Victory of the Attacker. 45k causalities for Virginian coalition, 15 for Conservatives

Battle of Southside Virginia
Attacker Total: 56.9
 * Tiers: 27+4.8+11.1=42.9
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +15
 * Modifiers: -10
 * Numbers: +7
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a
 * Government:-5

Defender Total: 30
 * Tiers: 27
 * Population: 2
 * Location: 0
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Total Victory for the allies. 16k causalities for Virginian coalition, 7.5k for Conservatives

Battle of Arlington
Attacker Total: 57.9
 * Tiers: 27+4.8+11.1=42.9
 * Population: +4
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: 0
 * Numbers: +6
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a
 * Government:-5

Defender Total: 34
 * Tiers: 27
 * Population: 2
 * Location: 5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +0
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * Fronts: n/a

Total Victory. 13.7k causalities for Virginian coalition. Conservative rebels are whipped out.

Overall Result
Rebellion crushed. No victory points gained.

Invasion Of South Dakota
The Socialist Republic of The Midwest

Total: 52
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +12
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strength:+5
 * Recent Wars: n/a

South Dakota + North Dakota

Total: 20
 * Tiers: +8
 * Population: +1
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +2
 * Recent wars: n/a

Casualties: 7,500 Socialist Troops, 18,000 Dakotan Troops

Results: South Dakota Collapses and North Dakota loses land and is on the verge of collapsing

Invasion of North Dakota
The Socialist Republic of The Midwest

Total: 48
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +12
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: + 4
 * Government Strength:+5
 * Recent Wars: n/a

North Dakota

Total: 15
 * Tiers: +8
 * Population: +1
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength:+5
 * Recent Wars: n/a

Casualties 2,800 Socialist Troops, 8,900 Dakotan Troops

Results: North Dakota collapses leading to a full annexation of the Dakotas by the Socialist Republic of The Midwest.

2022
Attacker: Kentucky (L), CSA (A),Virginia (S)

Defender: West Virginia

Battle of Bluefield
Attacker Total: +36.6
 * Tiers: +17.5 +11.1
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: -10
 * Numbers: +6 +3
 * Government Strength:+5
 * Recent Wars:-6

Defender Total: 42
 * Tiers: +8+4
 * Population: +2
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength:+5
 * Recent Wars: n/a
 * 40% Boost

Indecisive Victory for West Virginia 7.5k dead for WV, 10.8k dead for Kentucky, 11k dead for Alabama.

Fires, Casualties have been redone recently.

Casualties should change since Nate joined my side.

Battle of Thunder Basin
Montana
 * Tiers: +6
 * Population: +1
 * Location: +15
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars: n/a

Total: 28

Wyoming
 * Tiers: +6
 * Population: +.5
 * Location: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent wars: n/a

Total: 12.5

Result: Decisive Montana Victory (by margin of 15.5)

Casualties: Montana loses 4,132 of 20,660 and Wyoming loses 8,205 of 11,722. Remaining Montana Forces: 16,528 and Remaining Wyoming Forces: 3,517

2nd Battle of Thunder Basin
Montana
 * Tiers: +6
 * Population: +1
 * Location: +15
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars: n/a

Total: 28

Wyoming
 * Tiers: +6
 * Population: +.5
 * Location: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent wars: n/a

Total: 12.5

Result: Decisive Montana Victory (by margin of 15.5) '''Wyoming Collaspaes and Montana gains 2 VPs.

First Battle
'''Socialist Repub. of The Midwest''' Total: 45
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +17
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strengths: +5
 * Recent Wars: -12

Missouri Total: 39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Sassy Result: You still win, but if I could dock you points for the last algo, I honestly would. +50 for 11 million people? Dry Result: Minnesota wins, both sides take light causalities.

Second Battle
'''Socialist Repub. of The Midwest''' Total: 45
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +17
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strengths: +5
 * Recent Wars: -12

Missouri Total: 39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Sassy Result: You still win, but if I could dock you points for the last algo, I honestly would. +50 for 11 million people? Dry Result: Minnesota wins, both sides take light causalities.

Third Battle
'''Socialist Repub. of The Midwest''' Total: 45
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +17
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strengths: +5
 * Recent Wars: -12

Missouri Total: 39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Sassy Result: You still win, but if I could dock you points for the last algo, I honestly would. +50 for 11 million people? Dry Result: Minnesota wins, both sides take light causalities.

Fourth Battle
'''Socialist Repub. of The Midwest''' Total: 45
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +17
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strengths: +5
 * Recent Wars: -12

Missouri Total: 39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Sassy Result: You still win, but if I could dock you points for the last algo, I honestly would. +50 for 11 million people? Dry Result: Minnesota wins, both sides take light causalities.

Fifth Battle
'''Socialist Repub. of The Midwest''' Total: 45
 * Tiers: +22
 * Population: +17
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +8
 * Government Strengths: +5
 * Recent Wars: -12

Missouri Total: 39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Sassy Result: You still win, but if I could dock you points for the last algo, I honestly would. +50 for 11 million people? Dry Result: Minnesota wins, both sides take light causalities.

Overall Result
Missouri Collapses (Kentucky Algo coming tomorrow)

Battle 1 (Kentucky Invasion)
Kentucky Total: +20,5
 * Tiers: +16
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +6,5
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10

Missouri Total: +39
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +5
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Kentucky Loses, MO counter attack incoming

Battle 2 (Missouri Counter Attack)
Missouri Total: +44
 * Tiers: +24
 * Population: +6
 * Location: +10
 * Numbers: +4
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Front Penalty: -10

Kentucky Total: +5,5
 * Tiers: +16
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +6,5
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10

Overall Result
Kentucky loses 1 Vp, Missouri Collapses

First Battle
NAU Total: 88 + troops
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +49
 * Numbers: not yet known
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Recent Wars: -17 (SAD!)
 * Gov't: +5

Kentucky Total: +17.25
 * Tiers: +17.5
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10
 * Buff: *1.5

Discussion
Appalachian Mountains bonus applies to me, Southwest Virginia (*Mine since my intervention in the Virginian Civil War) is located on the Appalachian Mountains, which is like a third of my territory. ~Bear

Not_invading_there.jpeg ~Fires

I just luv how West Virginia got the Appalachian Mountains bonus and how you decided the place i was invading West Virginia for me thanks. And somehow this bonus doesn't apply here. ~Bear

Second Battle
NAU Total: 88 + troops
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +49
 * Numbers: not yet known
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Recent Wars: -17 (SAD!)
 * Gov't: +5

Kentucky Total: +17.25
 * Tiers: +17.5
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10
 * Buff: *1.5

Third Battle
NAU Total: 88 + troops
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +49
 * Numbers: not yet known
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Recent Wars: -17 (SAD!)
 * Gov't: +5

Kentucky Total: +17.25
 * Tiers: +17.5
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10
 * Buff: *1.5

Fourth Battle
NAU Total: 88 + troops
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +49
 * Numbers: not yet known
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Recent Wars: -17 (SAD!)
 * Gov't: +5

Kentucky Total: +17.25
 * Tiers: +17.5
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10
 * Buff: *1.5

Fifth Battle
NAU Total: 88 + troops
 * Tiers: +40
 * Population: +49
 * Numbers: not yet known
 * Location: +10
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Recent Wars: -17 (SAD!)
 * Gov't: +5

Kentucky Total: +17.25
 * Tiers: +17.5
 * Population: +5
 * Location: +5
 * Modifiers: n/a
 * Numbers: +1
 * Government Strength: +5
 * Recent Wars:-12
 * Fronts: -10
 * Buff: *1.5

Overall result
-5 Vp for Kentucky, Kentucky collaspes Sorry, but this is pre-emptive: the events haven't been posted so the majority of players have not yet started let alone finished their turns. It is too soon to write this algo, until you know who is committing to the conflict. On a side note, where are the troop numbers- as far as I know it's your 60,000/10,000 (you don't even know yet), versus the majority of his military and his allies.

Moderator Request
Edge, please check your talk page as I would love to help out as a moderator. Regardless of that, can you please take steps to reduce the economic implausibility (yes I know the scenario itself is implausible, but I mean contextual implausibility) of many players, who seem to get away with unlimited military spending and yet massive economic growth? It is getting harder to play this game properly: there is no point trying to sound remotely plausible when your enemies can get away with whatever they like. I understand you've been on finals week so it is completely understandable that you haven't yet had a chance to crack down on this, but I ask that when you are back you do, or else the game may well collapse. Yours sincerely, Emp (also thanks for creating such an entertaining game in the first place) --His Imperial Majesty, Emperor Romanus (talk) 09:07, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Declaration of Death
Time of death: 4:46 GMT