War Algorithm result page (An Alternate 1921 Map Game)- Archive 3

Norway-Lithuanian war of 1940.6

 * State of Economy: +5 Norway, +7.5 Lithuania
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Norway and Lithuania, 6 being normal.
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 for Norway, +10 for Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Both 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Norway
 * War Weariness: Lithuania is war waery-5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 main battle tanks, 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironcalds, dreadnaugts, battleships or aircraft carryers (depends on historic time) in the war then they get +1 for land, sea and/or air. N/A
 * Morale: -10 Norway In face of larger army, +5 Lithuania for in face of a smaller army. Norway lost to Lithuania last time= Norway -5
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains, Polar ice cap, or jungle- Lithuania -3 and Norway +4.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker Lithuania -4 and Norawy +5.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A.
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Finland +2 to Norway. USSR to Lithuania +2 Lithuania
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= N/A
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side=N/A
 * Regional tactical Advantage: +5 defender/-3 attacker (The Norwegian mountains)
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. In this case the defender gets an advantage of +5 and the attacker gets a disadvantage of -6
 * Victim nations' life or death = +10 Norway fears being whipped from history
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) 1,000,00 Lithuanians= 50 Norway 12,000= 0.5
 * 1) Lithuania score= 59.5
 * 2) Norway scores= 42.5
 * 3) Result= The general assault on Norway is a celar victory, Nordland region, the ports of Narvik and Tondhime fall. The and the bridgehead in central Norway expands slightly.

Norway-Lithuanian war of 1941

 * State of Economy: +5 Norway, +7.5 Lithuania
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Norway and Lithuania, 6 being normal.
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 for Norway, +10 for Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Both 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Norway
 * War Weariness: Lithuania is war waery-5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 main battle tanks, 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironcalds, dreadnaugts, battleships or aircraft carryers (depends on historic time) in the war then they get +1 for land, sea and/or air. N/A
 * Morale: -10 Norway In face of larger army, +5 Lithuania for in face of a smaller army. Norway lost to Lithuania last time= Norway -5
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains, Polar ice cap, or jungle- Lithuania -3 and Norway +4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A.
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Finland +2 to Norway.
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= USSR+ 1 Lithuania
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side=N/A
 * Regional tactical Advantage: +5 defender/-3 attacker (The Norwegian mountains)
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. In this case the defender gets an advantage of +5 and the attacker gets a disadvantage of -6
 * Victim nations' life or death = +10 Norway fears being whipped from history
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) 700,000 Lithuanians= 50 Norway 12,000= 0.5
 * 1) Lithuania score= 47.5
 * 2) Norway scores= 37.5
 * 3) Result= The general assault on Norway is a clear victory and the southern part's coastal regions falls.

1941 Arabia war with British Yemen

 * State of Economy: +10 (UK), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Arabian and UK= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 UK colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, UK 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 UK colonials in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabian in face of a smaller UK colonial army. Yemen has lost to Arabia= -5 to Yemen.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian= Arabian +2
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 100,000 = 8.75 points. UK colonial garrisons = circa 10,000 - 12,000 = 0.5 points.


 * Yemen’s score= 53.6
 * Arabian Score= 58.74
 * Result= A close Arabian victory in central Yemen. Arabia takes a modest gains.

1941 USSR invasion of northern Norway

 * State of Economy: +5 Norway, +7.5 USSR
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Norway 6 and USSR 9.
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 for Norway, +10 for USSR
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, USSR 4, Norway 1.
 * Side with greater population: +3 USSR
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Norway
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 main battle tanks, 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironcalds, dreadnaugts, battleships or aircraft carryers (depends on historic time) in the war then they get +1 for land, sea and/or air. N/A
 * Morale: -10 Norway In face of larger army, +5 USSR for in face of a smaller army.
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains, Polar ice cap, or jungle- USSR-3 and Norway +4.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker USSR-4 and Norawy +5.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A.
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Finland +2 to Norway.
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= USSR+ 1 USSR
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side=N/A
 * Regional tactical Advantage: +5 defender/-3 attacker (The Norwegian mountains)
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. In this case the defender gets an advantage of +5 and the attacker gets a disadvantage of -6
 * Victim nations' life or death = +10 Norway fears being whipped from history
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) 1,000,00 USSR= 50 Norway 12,000= 0.5
 * 1) USSR scores= 67.5
 * 2) Norway scores= 46.5
 * 3) Result= The general assault on Norway is a decisive victory and the northern part Norway (as far as Harstad and Tromsø, both of who fell to para-troops and a coastal assault.

Norway-Lithuanian war of 1942

 * State of Economy: +5 Norway, +7.5 Lithuania
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Norway and Lithuania, 6 being normal.
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 for Norway, +10 for Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Both 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Norway
 * War Weariness: Lithuania is war waery-5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 main battle tanks, 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironcalds, dreadnaugts, battleships or aircraft carryers (depends on historic time) in the war then they get +1 for land, sea and/or air. N/A
 * Morale: -10 Norway In face of larger army, +5 Lithuania for in face of a smaller army. Norway lost to Lithuania last time= Norway -5
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains, Polar ice cap, or jungle- Lithuania -3 and Norway +4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A.
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Finland +2 to Norway.
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= USSR+ 1 Lithuania
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side=N/A
 * Regional tactical Advantage: +5 defender/-3 attacker (The Norwegian mountains)
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. In this case the defender gets an advantage of +5 and the attacker gets a disadvantage of -6
 * Victim nations' life or death = +10 Norway fears being whipped from history
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) 700,000 Lithuanians= 50 Norway 12,000= 0.5
 * 1) Lithuania score= 47.5
 * 2) Norway scores= 37.5
 * 3) Result= Norway finally falls.

1942 Arabia war with British Yemen

 * State of Economy: +10 (UK), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Arabian and UK= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 UK colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, UK 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 UK colonials in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabian in face of a smaller UK colonial army. Yemen has lost to Arabia= -5 to Yemen.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian= Arabian +2
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 100,000 = 8.75 points. UK colonial garrisons = circa 10,000 - 12,000 = 0.5 points.


 * Yemen’s score= 53.6
 * Arabian Score= 58.74
 * Result= A close Arabian victory in central Yemen. Arabia takes a modest gains.

1942.6 Arabia war with British Yemen

 * State of Economy: +10 (UK), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Arabian and UK= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 UK colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, UK 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 UK colonials in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabian in face of a smaller UK colonial army. Yemen has lost to Arabia= -5 to Yemen.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Lithuania to UK = UK +1
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian, Lithuania to UK= Arabian +2, UK +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 200,000 = 10 points. UK colonial garrisons = circa 10,000 - 12,000 = 0.5 points + Lithuanian garrisons (50,000/20,000=2.5)


 * Yemen’s score= 39
 * Arabian Score= 51
 * Result=   impresive victory of Arabian army, Yemen lost almost half of it's territory
 * Result=   impresive victory of Arabian army, Yemen lost almost half of it's territory

1943 Lithuanian war with Denmark

 * State of Economy: +7,5 (Lithuania), +5 (Denmark)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=3 Denmark=1
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Denmark +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Denmark 1
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Denmark in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Denmark army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker Lithuania -4 Denmark +5
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= N/A
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Denmark is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 735‘000 Denmark 5‘000
 * Lithuanian score= 74
 * Denmark score=22.25
 * Result: Total and decisive Lithuanian victory. Denmark fully captured.

1943 Arabian war with British Yemen

 * State of Economy: +10 (UK), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Arabian and UK= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 UK colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, UK 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 for Arabia in face of larger Yemen army, +5 for Yemen in face of a smaller Arabian army. Yemen has lost to Arabia= -5 to Yemen.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Lithuania to UK = UK +1
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian, Lithuania to UK= Arabian +2, UK +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 200,000 = 10 points. UK colonial garrisons =100'000-150'000 = 6,5 points(aprox) + Lithuanian garrisons (150,000/20,000) =7.5
 * Yemen’s score= 61
 * Arabian Score= 36
 * Result= Crushing defeat of Arabian army due to replenishment of british Yemen garrison and increased Lithuanian intervention. Yemen manages to retake some of lost lands. Mahra sultanate also gains some lands.

1943.5 Arabia war against Jordan

 * State of Economy: +10 (UK), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: Ruwaished-Mafraq forts. UK +2
 * Technology: Arabian and UK= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 UK colony, + 10 Arabia
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, UK 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 for Jordania in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabia in face of a smaller Jordanian army. Arabia has lost to another british colony last turn= -5 to Arabia.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Lithuania to UK = UK +1
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian, Lithuania to UK= Arabian +2, UK +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 215‘000= 10,75 points. UK colonial garrisons  10‘000 and Ruwaished-Mafraq garrison 100‘000= 5,5 points
 * Jordan score= 44,5
 * Arabian Score= 46,75
 * Close and indecisive Arabian victory, in some places Arabia advances to it‘s old borders.

1943.5 Mahra Sultanate war against Arab confederation

 * State of Economy: +7.5 (Mahra), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Arabian=6 Mahra= 3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Arabia, + 10 Mahra
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, Mahra 3
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: Arabia- 5
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 for Arabia in face of larger Mahra army, +5 for Mahra in face of a smaller Arabian army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker - 3 and + defender gains 4.
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Lithuania to Mahra = Mahra +1
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to Arabian, Lithuania to Mahra= Arabian +2, Mahra +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = N/A
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 0= 0 points. Mahra garrison and reserve =150'000 = 7,5 points
 * Yemen’s score= 41
 * Arabian Score= 33
 * Minor victory against Arabia, few pixels of Yemen land taken back.

1943.5 Lithuanian war with Iceland

 * State of Economy: +7,5 Lithuania, +5 Iceland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=3, Iceland=1
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Iceland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Iceland 1
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Iceland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Iceland army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the attacker Lithuania -4 Iceland +5
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= N/A
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Iceland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Iceland is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 735‘000= 36,75, Iceland 10'000= 0.5
 * Lithuanian score= 71.25
 * Iceland score= 3
 * Result= Crushing defeat of Icelands army, Lithuania captures all country.

1945 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, Lithuania -3, Finland +4
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: Lithuania crossing northwestern mountains. Lithuania -3, Finland +5
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose part of it's territory.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 50'000= 2.5
 * Lithuanian score= 69.75
 * Finland score= 34
 * Result= Impresive victory of Lithuanian Army, nor relief nor cold climate did not helped Finnish army and it was forced to abandon their positions. Mountaineous region captured.

1945.5 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose part of it's territory.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 100'000= 5
 * Lithuanian score= 75.75
 * Finland score= 22.5
 * Result= Just awesome victory by Lithuanian forces.  No regional advantage, low morale and superior LAF numbers caused that Finnish soldiers could not hold it, masive coastal territories occupied by Lithuania.

1946 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland. Lithuania is war weary, Lithuania -5
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose part of it's territory.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 100'000= 5
 * Lithuanian score= 70.75
 * Finland score= 22.5
 * Result= Lithuania continue it's victorious war and takes more Finnish lands.

1946.5 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland. Lithuania is war weary, Lithuania -5
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1, Yugoslavia to Finland +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose part of it's territory.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 100'000= 5
 * Lithuanian score= 70.75
 * Finland score= 32.5
 * Result= Lithuanian Victory again. Northern Finland taken.

1947 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland. Lithuania is war weary, Lithuania -5
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1, Yugoslavia to Finland +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose part of it's territory.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 100'000= 5
 * Lithuanian score= 70.75
 * Finland score= 32.5
 * Result= Lithuanian army victory again, Finnish lakes taken.

1947.5 USSR invasion of Finland
Regional tactical Advantage: +5 Finland/-3 USSR (All those southern lakes like Päijänne and Pihlajavesi.)
 * State of Economy: +7.5 USSR, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: USSR=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 USSR
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, USSR 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 USSR
 * Side with greater industry: +3 USSR
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger USSR army, +5 for USSR in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland. USSR is war weary, USSR -5
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains, polar or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Dutch to Finns+2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Yugoslavia to Finns+1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, USSR -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing to lose.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) USSR 700,000= 35, Finland 100'000= 5
 * USSRn score= 59
 * Finland score= 30.5
 * Result= USSR victorious war and takes new Finnish lands up to lake Päijänne.

1947.5 Lithuanian war with Finland

 * State of Economy: +10 Lithuania, +2.5 Finland
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: N/A
 * Technology: Lithuania=6, Finland=3
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 Finland +10 Lithuania
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Lithuania 3, Finland 2
 * Side with greater population: +3 Lithuania
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Lithuania
 * War Weariness: N.A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 Finland in face of larger Lithuanian army, +5 for Lithuania in face of a smaller Finnish army. Finland lost last time, -5 Finland. Lithuania is war weary, Lithuania -5
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island: N/A
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle: N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= Britain to Lithuania +2
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Britain to Lithuania +1, Yugoslavia to Finland +1
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Economic war motives = + 2 to the attacker.
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. Finland +5, Lithuania -4
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the Finland is fearing being wiped out from history.
 * Strength: of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Lithuania 635‘000= 31,75, Finland 100'000/2= 2.5
 * Lithuanian score= 70.75
 * Finland score= 30
 * Result= Helsinki falls, Finland capitulates.

1951.6 Arabia war with Italian Somaliland

 * State of Economy: +10 (ITALIAN SOMALIALAND), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: Mogadishu, Italian Somaliland + 10
 * Technology: Arabian and ITALIAN SOMALIALAND= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, ITALIAN SOMALIALAND 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: N/A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonials in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabian in face of a smaller ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonial army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the Arabia - 4 and Italian Somaliland + gains 5.
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to the Arabians= Arabians +2
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 900,000 = 45 points. ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonial garrisons = circa 350,000=17.5.


 * Italian Somaliland score= 72.5
 * Arabian Score= 77
 * Result= A close Arabian victory along the Puntland coast of northern Italian Somaliland.

1952 Arabia war with Italian Somaliland

 * State of Economy: +10 (ITALIAN SOMALIALAND), +10 (Arabian)
 * Many or major defenses and fortified places: Mogadishu, Italian Somaliland + 10
 * Technology: Arabian and ITALIAN SOMALIALAND= 6
 * Knowledge of landscape: +20 ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colony, + 10 Arabian
 * Each nation fall in to a power category, Arabian 4, ITALIAN SOMALIALAND 5
 * Side with greater population: +3 Arabian
 * Side with greater industry: +3 Arabian
 * War Weariness: N/A
 * If either side nation deploys over 500 Tanks (or main battle tanks after the Panzer III and alike were invented), 1,000 bombers, 10 attack submarines and/or 10 men-o-war, Ironclads, dreadnoughts, battleships or aircraft carriers (depends on historic time) N/A
 * Morale: -10 ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonials in face of larger Arabian army, +5 for Arabian in face of a smaller ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonial army.
 * Storming on to a coastline from the sea or on to an island, the Arabia - 4 and Italian Somaliland + gains 5.
 * Storming in to a desert, high mountains or jungle the, attacker N/A
 * Nuclear war N/A
 * Chemical weapons N/A
 * Every nation militarily helping with their side= N/A
 * Every nation offering supplies to their side= Germany and Japan to the Arabians= Arabians +2
 * Every vassal nation any way helping with their side= N/A
 * Political and moral motives= + 6 to the attacker.
 * Regional tactical Advantage: N/A
 * Armed expatiation in large extremism climates like Greenland, Niger, Nepal and Amazonia will also be very slow due to logistic and climate problems for any wood-be invader. N/A
 * Victim nations' life or death = + 10 to the colony is fearing being wiped from history.
 * Strength: # of troops divided by a factor of 20,000 (IE, 1,000,000 = 50 points) Arabian 900,000 = 45 points. ITALIAN SOMALIALAND colonial garrisons = circa 350,000=17.5.


 * Italian Somaliland score= 72.5
 * Arabian Score= 77
 * Result= A close Arabian victory along the eastern coast to the southern town of Kizmyo.